Financial Services Legal & Regulatory Update

March 2006

This webpage provides a very brief snapshot of some recent legal and regulatory developments impacting the financial services industry. This is provided as general information only, and can not be relied upon as legal advice (or used as a substitute for legal advice). Emergence Consulting accept no responsibility for the accuracy or currency of the information included herein.

Financial Services Regulation Refinements …

Regulations to implement the refinements to financial services proposed last year, were implemented recently (December 2005). Further amendments are still under consideration, so watch this space!

Many of the changes aim to clarify certain requirements or provide an option to reduce the compliance burden for industry participants. ASIC have indicated that in the initial stages, at least, they will adopt a ‘reasonable and pragmatic approach’ to compliance expectations, enabling the industry to adjust to the changes.


Financial Services Guides …

The changes implemented recently enable the following:

Licensees (or authorised representatives) with multi-channel operations can issue separate Financial Services guides for particular financial services or product offerings, if they so choose. Further, shorter form Financial Services Guides can now be issued to clients in certain situations.

The regulations pertaining to inclusion of remuneration and conflicts of interest information in Financial Services Guides are largely unchanged, despite the original intention to remove overlaps with the Statement of Advice information, although now vary slightly depending on whether personal advice is to be provided or not. However, generally speaking, where ascertainable, remuneration, commissions and other benefits should be included in the Financial Services Guide. Where this is not possible, the Financial Services Guide must contain either particulars (ranges/rates etc) of the remuneration calculation method OR general information about the manner and calculation methodology of remuneration and a statement that the amount or method will be disclosed upon the provision of personal advice.


Statements of Advice…

There have been further changes to the treatment of Statements of Advice and situations where additional personal advice is provided to clients. The concept of ‘further market-related advice’ has now been replaced with the ‘further advice’ concept, requiring…

Information about remuneration and conflicts of interest disclosure may now be provided verbally or in writing (or a combination). Previously it was required in writing. However, good business practice would probably suggest that licensees should continue including this important information in writing, to clearly demonstrate that it has been properly provided to clients.

Where the recommendation entails a change or replacement of product, advice of the losses/consequences relating to such advice can be detailed in the Statement of Advice or under separate disclosure (with a brief summary in the Statement of Advice).

Statements of Advice will no longer be required to detail alternative products or services considered (and the related obligations).


Product Disclosure Statements …

The key change in this area is the allowance of ‘short form’ statements to be issued to clients. These would contain a summary of the key risk, benefit, costs etc information currently contained in the longer version. However, a longer version must still be produced and provided to clients where requested. Again, in a practical sense, for those licensees who have managed to produce lean, concise disclosure documentation (as per ASIC’s regularly stated plea) this option should not be of great relevance.

Please note that the short-form option PDS will still require full information about fees and costs, for managed funds and superannuation products.


Basic Deposit Products …

Recent changes clarify that Product Disclosure Statements are not mandatory in relation to the provision of basic deposit products, although certain information relating to costs must still be provided to clients (and full information provided to clients where so requested). Please note that certain disclosures may be made verbally, rather than in writing.

The exemption for issuing Product Disclosure Statements has not been extended to cash management trust products, although Financial Services Guides and Statements of Advice will not be required for this product going forward.


General Insurance Products …

Key changes introduced in this product area include:

- the 18month transition period which applies to the new general insurance PDS content requirements commences from 20 December 2005;
- issuers have the option of issuing a supplementary PDS or replacement PDS on renewal of a general insurance product contract;
- Statements of Advice will not be required for the provision of certain insurance products, such as motor vehicle insurance, home building and home contents insurance, travel insurance etc. However, details of remuneration, commissions and conflicts of interest must still be disclosed to clients.


Retail/Wholesale Distinction …

Key changes resulting from implementation of the recommendations made last year include measures to enable related bodies corporate to avail the wholesale client categorisation, by determining status of the corporate group as a whole.
Accounting Certificates will only need to be provided every 2 years, rather than 6 months, going forward (provided circumstances do not change in the meantime).


APRA – reporting requirements for superannuation entities….

As from 1 July 2004, all trustees of superannuation entities including public offer superannuation funds, approved deposit funds, eligible rollover funds and pooled superannuation trusts are required to hold a Registerable Superannuation Entity (RSE) Licence. A transition period is operating until 30 June 2006 to enable current approved trustees to apply for the new licence, whilst new superannuation trustees require the licence from 1 July 2004. The requirements apply to all superannuation trustees, with the only exclusions from licensing available to self-managed superannuation funds regulated by the ATO, and public sector superannuation schemes.

The changes require superannuation trustees to meet ongoing minimum standards of fitness and propriety, maintain risk management strategies and complete risk management plans for each fund under their control.

Enforcement powers and penalty provisions have also been strengthened, including provisions with a fault and a strict liability component.

APRA have released a number of guidelines on the proposed operating standards and regulations, covering the following areas:

· Fit and proper operating standard
· Outsourcing operating standard
· Adequate resources operating standard
· Risk management requirements; and
· Capital requirements - Net Tangible Assets.

Superannuation entities are advised to close their funds, appoint a licensed trustee or prepare and lodge their RSE and Fund Registration applications as a matter or urgency at this stage, if they wish to ensure compliance prior to expiration of the transition period.


Relief for Superannuation investment strategy product disclosure…

ASIC have extended the interim relief for superannuation trustees, delaying the commencement of the product disclosure requirements from 30 June 2005 until 30 June 2006, pursuant to Class Order 05/346. Under the Corporations Act, superannuation trustees will need to provide a Product Disclosure Statement to members and prospective members about some types of underlying investments, and particular financial products which may be acquired through the investment strategy of the fund.

Licensing of Property investment advisers…

The Joint Committee of Corporations and Financial Services issued a report in 2005 proposing the regulation and licensing of those who provide property investment advice. The report recognises that there a range of operators providing advice and promoting property investment which are unregulated, some of which engage in unscrupulous practices and behaviours, to the detriment of consumers and honest service providers. At this stage there is no dedicated specialist industry association imposing codes of conduct or providing training for such property investment advisers. The paper discusses whether responsibility for supervision of the industry should fall with the ACCC or ASIC, with the latter being the likely regulator. Neither self-regulation nor state-based regulation were considered to be an appropriate solution.

Key recommendations include the following:

· That property investment advice be regulated in line with other financial product advice under the Corporations Act;
· That property investment advisers be required to hold an Australian Financial Services Licence;
· That ASIC hold prime responsibility for enforcement;
· That ACCC hold certain powers to exercise against spruikers who contravene the Trade Practices Act;
· That ASIC conduct targeted advertising and education programs to alert consumers to the risks;


Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Bill 2005…

A draft bill addressing Australia’s response to global initiatives and requirements to prevent money laundering and terrorism financing activities was released in December 2005 for comment (until April 2006).

The requirements focus on a range of services (designated services) and the customer identification, reporting and compliance obligations of designated service providers (reporting entities). This will impact a wide range of financial services providers and the gambling sector.

There are 64 designated services including the following:


· Opening accounts and conducting transactions with banks and ADIs;
· Provision of loans (including guarantee), finance leases and hire purchase;
· Issuing/cashing travellers cheques, credit/debit cards, stored value cards and money/postal orders;
· Involvement in funds transfers;
· Issue/sale/advice regarding securities, scheme interests, foreign exchange or derivatives;
· Issue/advice re life policies, pensions, annuities or superannuation;
· Provision of custodial/deposit service;
· Exchange/collection/delivery of currency;
· Purchase/sale of bullion; and
· Provision of a gambling service.

The designated service provider will be a reporting entity if the designated service is provided at/through a permanent establishment in Australia or by an Australian resident (or subsidiary) at/through an overseas branch.

Some key proposed obligations are summarised below:

1. Know your customer requirements:
· must know your customer;
· assign each customer a risk classification (to be updated periodically); and
· monitor the transactions of each customer.
· Risk factor based on assessment of customer, transactions, jurisdiction, volume/size etc.

2. Identification requirements:
· compliance with prescribed identification procedure
· exemptions for certain existing customers (continuous relationship) (unless risk triggers occur);
· low-risk services
· special circumstances enabling identification process to be carried out within 5 business days of providing the service eg non face-to-face services, securities/derivatives transactions, life policies.
· Delegation of identification procedure to third parties (agents or other reporting entities)
· Must demonstrate reasonable precautions were taken and due diligence exercised.

3. Customer information:
· Individuals – name, home address, date & place of birth, residencies and citizenship. Verification through 100 point check, referees or electronic verification.
· Companies – name, address of principal place of business, ABN, country/date of incorporation, directors/company secretary names, substantial shareholders/controlling shareholders, and evidence of authorisation to deal with reporting entity.
· Additional information for enhanced due diligence might include occupation, business activities, purpose of transaction, expected nature/level of transactional behaviour, income/assets available, source of funds, financial position, ownership & control structure, beneficial ownership of funds and transactions, destination of funds and related parties.

4. Transaction monitoring:
· Implement a transaction monitoring program
· Identify unusual transactions by reference to expected behaviour
· Identify suspicious matters

5. Transaction reporting:

· Suspicious matters/transactions
· Obligation may arise with potential client enquiries
· Report to AUSTRAC within 3 business days or within 24 hours (terrorist financing)
· Rules set out 24 matters to be considered in forming suspicion
· Cannot alert customer to suspicion or report
· Good faith suspicious reports are exempt from civil suit (unless negligent)
· Transfer of physical or e-currency of $10,000 or more (within 10 business days)
· International funds transfer instructions (within 10 business days)

6. Record keeping:
· Transaction documentation
· Information re provision of services
· Customer identification records and verification information
· Correspondent banking reports

7. AML/CTF Program:
· Implement, maintain and comply with program
· Take action to identify and materially mitigate risk of involvement or facilitation of money laundering or terrorist financing
· Information re provision of services
· Risk-based assessments
· Identify changes in risk categorisation
· Risk awareness program for staff/training
· Third party due diligence
· Employee screening
· Compliance program
· Assess all new services/methods/technologies
· Board and senior management responsibility
· Regular independent review of effectiveness and compliance with program

Much of the detail will be contained in the yet to be drafted Regulations and AML/CTF Rules to be issued by AUSTRAC, which will have the force of law. AUSTRAC will also consult with industry to produce a set of Guidelines (which will not have the force of law) to assist reporting entities in the interpretation of their obligations, and provide a ‘best practice’ approach for compliance.


Funds Management - pricing discretion…

ASIC have recently issued Class Order 05/1236(which amends Class Order 05/26) enabling responsible entities to exercise limited discretions when calculating unit prices. Responsible entities of both listed and unlisted schemes have until 1 May 2006 to implement procedures facilitating their compliance with the conditions of the Class Order relief.

Where a scheme constitution specifies a formula or method for determining unit prices, rather than set dollar amounts, the Responsible Entity can exercise discretion in certain areas, providing relief from the strict application of s601GA of the Corporations Act, providing certain conditions are satisfied.

Anticipated discretions to be exercised include:

- Estimating an allowance in transaction costs
- Selection of valuation method
- Determining entry or exit fees
- Determining total NAV of the scheme
- Allocating assets, liabilities, revenue & expenses between classes
- Rounding off the issue price or withdrawal amount
- Determining time for issue price to be calculated
- Determining time at which asset values and liabilities will be calculated.

The conditions of the relief placed on Responsible Entities include:

- To act reasonably in exercising the discretion
- To exercise the discretion in accordance with normal commercial practice
- To exercise discretion in accordance with documented policy (and advise cclients that it is available to members upon request); and
- To retain relevant documents for 7years

All Product Disclosure Statements prepared (and issued) after 1 May 2006 must contain a statement advising clients/potential clients that a written policy regarding this discretion exists and that a copy can be provided upon request.


Shorter Prospectuses…

ASIC have just released draft guidelines for issuers and advisers on the preparation of prospectuses. Entitled ‘Better Prospectus Disclosure’ there is a focus on producing documents which are shorter, more readable and concise. Issuers should explain the practical implications of the offering, rather than a ‘mass of legal and financial’ detail. There should be a balanced portrayal of risk and return, and risk disclosures should be specific not voluminous.

Key recommendations include:

· Brevity & plain english;
· Omission of extraneous information;
· Highlight critical information;
· Logical presentation & navigation of information; and
· Incorporation of technical detail by reference.

Comments on the draft guidelines are due to ASIC by 7 April 2006.


Superannuation advertising…

ASIC have just released a warning to superannuation funds to avoid claims about fees and costs and omit critical information. Information must be comprehensive and explicitly detail any exclusions. A report has been released detailing ASIC’s review of superannuation advertising since 2004, summarising trends in advertising. ASIC have raised concerns about certain funds which advertise single fees and do not reference other costs, hence potentially misleading clients.

A particular focus of the non-disclosure of costs regards transaction costs – buy/sell spreads when investments are bought or sold by a fund.


Non-Cash payment facilities…

In November, ASIC released a new policy statement PS 185 on the regulation of non-cash payment (NCP) facilities, in recognition that certain such facilities do not necessitate full regulation.

The policy statement details ASIC’s approach and class order relief for low value NCP facilities, gift voucher/cards, prepaid mobile phone accounts, loyalty schemes and e-road toll devices.

A further policy proposal paper was issued in December 2005 which canvasses ASIC’s approach to regulation of NCP facilities on an ongoing basis, relief criteria and low-value facilities.


APRA/ASIC guide to unit pricing…

In November, ASIC and APRA released a joint publication guide to good practice in unit pricing, applicable to life insurance, superannuation and managed funds.

The guide focuses on a wide range of areas including board/senior management oversight, strategic control over unit pricing calculation methodology, resourcing unit pricing, legal compliance, risk management, unit pricing policies & procedures, maintenance of appropriate systems and controls, accountability, current technology, timely communication to clients, and monitoring/identification/reporting/resolution of unit pricing errors.

The over-riding principle is to ensure you act honestly, diligently and impartially and in the best interests of all unitholders.

New ASIC licence application process…

In November, ASIC introduced a revised AFSL application process, which now requires only a few core proofs (business description, Responsible Officer and organisational competency information, and financial statement) to be lodged with the initial application. The remaining proofs are then to be provided (as requested by ASIC) in the requisition period whilst ASIC are assessing the application.